Caught Between Tourism Industry and Environmental Concerns


We are barely more than a month into 2019, and already there has been talk of restricting access to more popular tourist destinations. In the spotlight this time are the 29 islands that make up Indonesia’s Komodo National Park – home to the world’s largest lizards – but, for once, pesky tourists aren’t to blame.

Speaking to English-language Indonesian news portal Tempo on January 18, the governor of East Nusa Tenggara (NTT), Viktor Bungtilu Laiskodat, said the park’s famed reptile inhabitants, “dragons” known for their hulking proportions, were becoming smaller because of a declining deer population, the result of rampant poaching.

“The NTT government will reorganise and improve the Komodo National Park so that it can further sustain Komodo habitats,” said the governor. “We plan to close the park for an entire year.”

According to the World Wide Fund for Nature, Komodo dragons are extremely vulnerable to extinction due to human activity, such as the pinching of their prey, and the any closure aimed at boosting the giant lizard population would be supported by environmentalists.

Not surprisingly, though, Arief Yahya, Indonesia’s minister of tourism, is opposed to the idea.

“Closing Komodo National Park is irrelevant,” he said at the ministry’s main office in Jakarta, on January 29, as quoted by Tempo.


This followed a statement by Siti Nurbaya Bakar, the minister of environment and forestry. “Komodo National Park is a tourist destination where a lot of entrepreneurs, from the tourism ministry and others, run businesses,” she said on January 24.

Any shutdown was the concern of the central government, Bakar asserted, putting the local administration in its place, and Jakarta was collecting information to assess whether it was necessary to implement one. The Jakarta Post reported on January 30 that a meeting to discuss what Yahya describes as “the Komodo National Park polemic” would be held, although there has been no news on when or where.

NTT figures in tourism industry publication TTG Asia state that Komodo National Park received 176,830 arrivals last year, a 48 per cent increase over 2017, and as those numbers have swelled, so too has the local economy. Tempo reports that more than 4,500 people in the region, many of whom rely on tourism for their livelihood, would be affected by a closure.

However, if the plan to repopulate the park with prey doesn’t get the green light, there are fears the dragons could turn to cannibalism, and worst case scenarios see the extinction of the species. Should that happen, tourism to the remote islands would almost certainly dry up, leaving locals who work in the industry with little else to do to make ends meet.

While officials debate how to proceed, travel agencies and tour operators are left in limbo. “This announcement is too sudden,” said Abed Frans, NTT chairman of the Association of the Indonesian Tours and Travel Agencies, speaking to TTG Asia. “There were no discussions with associations, travel trade, or the community [...] 70 per cent of the community livelihood relies on the national park,” he continued. According to The Jakarta Post, Yahya was also concerned with the trouble a closure might cause travel agencies, stressing that maintaining tourism was “more important” than securing the park’s animal population.

For now, the fate of the park, and its fearsome dragons, hangs in the balance, caught between the needs of the environment and an industry that does little to protect it.


Ida Ayu